Main Article Content

Authors

Supported by the philosophies of Heidegger and Gadamer, whose we confront with the critical theory, this article returns to the dialogue between philosophy and history. When these two authors are read in contrast with that other stream of thought, resonances and mutual implications start to be found, as well as the divergences that present themselves. From this confrontation we intend to access to a consideration of the time and the history that allows to elaborate a critical philosophy. The article makes Gadamer's and Heidegger's ontologies of historicity and time productive for a social philosophy.

Fernando Forero Pineda, Department of Philosophy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Doctor of Philosophy from Fern-Universität Hagen (Germany) and the Universidad Nacional de Colombia; He completed his PhD in the framework of the Deutschlateinamerikanisches Forschungs- und Promotionsnetzwerk Philosophie. He has a master's degree in philosophy from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and a degree in social sciences and sociologist. He is a Research Group in Contemporary Hermeneutics (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). In his doctoral research, he dealt with the evolution of Hegelian philosophy in the Jena period and particularly with the concept of negativity in that young professor. His fields of interest are the sources of Hegel's philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Romanticism and Postkantian idealism) and the prolongations of Hegelian philosophy both in Marx and Marxism and in hermeneutic philosophy ( particularly in Heidegger and Gadamer). Another of his areas of interest is classical and contemporary social theory. He has done research on classical social theory (Marx, Durkheim and Weber), and on social and political thinking at the Frankfurt School (Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Habermas, Honneth and the recent works of Hartmund Rosa, Reiner Forst and Rahel Jaeggi ).

Forero Pineda, F. (2020). Time and History: Contribution to a Social Critical Philosophy. Praxis Filosófica, (50), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i50.8792

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.