Main Article Content

Authors

In this paper, I provide a characterization of logical disagreement. According to my notion, the merely verbal disagreements in logic are unusual. Most logical disagreements are just descriptive disagreements about the world or about the meaning of the connectives, while others are evaluative disagreements about the notion of validity.

Diego Tajer

Licenciado en Filosofía por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Doctorando en la misma universidad, financiado con una beca doctoral del CONICET. Sus temas de investigación son filosofía de la lógica y epistemología formal. Entre sus publicaciones se encuentran “Anti-realism and infinitary proofs” (Análisis Filosófico, 2012) , “La paradoja de Fitch y los mundos epistémicos abiertos” (Manuscrito, 2014).Dirección postal: Universidad de Buenos Aires, (Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Puan 480, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Anderson, A. & Belnap, N. (1962). The pure calculus of entailment. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 27, 19–52.

Beall, J.C. & Restall, G. (2006). Logical Pluralism. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.

Bueno, O. & Shalkowki, S. (2009). Modalism and logical pluralism. Mind 118: 295-321.

Chalmers, D. (2011). Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review, 120(4):515–566.

Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Boston, EE.UU.: Harvard University Press.

Field H. (2009). The normative role of logic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 82, 251–268.

Grice, P. (1991). Indicative conditionals. En Grice, P. (1991). Studies on the way of words. Cambridge, Estados Unidos: Harvard University Press.

Jenkins, C. (2014). Merely verbal disputes. Erkenntnis, 79(1 Suppl.): 11-30.

Lukasiewicz, J. (1970). On determinism. In Lukasiewicz, J., Selected Works (ed.L. Borkowski), Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company, 1970,110-128.

Kolbel, M. (2004). Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104, 53:73.

MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assesment sensitivity. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.

Mares, E. (2003). Relevant logic. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.

McGee, V. (1985). A counter-example to modus ponens. Journal of Philosophy, 82(9), 462–471.

Priest, G. (2006). Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.

Putnam, H. (1975) The logic of quantum mechanics. En Putnam, H. (1975). Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge, EE.UU.: Cambridge University Press, 174-197.

Quine, W.V.O. (1970). Philosophy of Logic. Boston, EE.UU.:Harvard University Press.

Tarski, A. (1936). On the concept of following logically, tr. M. Stroinska y D. Hitchcock, in History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (2002), 155-196.

Smith, N. (2008). Vagueness and degrees of truth. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.

Stalnaker, R. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5: 269-286.

Tennant, N. (2002). The taming of the true. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.
Tajer, D. (2015). Characterizing logical disagreement (spanish version). Praxis Filosófica, (40), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i40.3015

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.