Main Article Content

Authors

Context: Within the framework of Plato's arguments in the dialogues Euthyphro and Laws, this article examines the different dimensions of the challenge posed by atheism and impiety to the morality of citizens and the stability of political institutions. The last section describes some of the difficulties modern democracies face in establishing legal and political limits on criticism of religious practices and beliefs.
Methodology: Plato's dialogues Euthyphro and Laws were closely studied to support the assessments and comparisons between early and late conceptions of piety and religious belief. Current and highly regarded academic literature was also used.
Conclusions: The presentation concludes that modern democracies lack the legitimacy to defend legal and penal initiatives similar to those advocated by Plato, and that religious beliefs deserve the same legal protection afforded by freedom of expression as any other type of belief.

José Luis Velázquez Jordana, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.

José Luis Velázquez Jordana, profesor de Filosofía Moral en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Berg, J. (1991). How could ethics depend on religion. En P. Singer (Comp.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 525-533). Blackwell.

Bobonich, C. (1991). Persuasion, Compulsion and Freedom in Plato’s Laws. The Classical Quarterly, 41(2), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800004547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800004547

Burkert, W. (2007). Religión griega arcaica y clásica. Abada.

Burnet, J. (1979). Plato's Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates and Crito. Oxford Clarendon Press.

Camus, A. (1951). L'Homme révolté. Gallimard.

De Mahieu, W. (1964). La doctrine des athées au Xe livre des Lois de Platon [Étude des sources]. Revue belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 42(1), 16-47. https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.1964.2502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.1964.2502

Diamond, E. (S. F.) Philosophical Piety in Plato's Euthyphro. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/14854418/Philosophical_Piety_in_Platos_Euthyphro

Flew, A. (1966). God and Philosophy. Hutchinson.

Geach, P. (1966). Plato's Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary. The Monist, 50(3), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196650327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196650327

Goggans, P. N. (2002). Reflections on Piety: Euthyphro as Modern Man. Humanitas, 15(2), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.5840/humanitas200215215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/humanitas200215215

Gómez Lobo, A. (Trad.) (1997). Traducción, análisis y notas. En Platón, Eutifrón. Editorial Universitaria.

Harris, J. (1998). Supermán y la Mujer Maravillosa. Las dimensiones éticas de la bio tecnología humana. Tecnos.

Helmer, E. (2017). Aux frontières de la cité : les incurables de Platon. Philosophie Antique, (17), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.287

Hladký, V. (2019). Plato’s Three Forms of Impiety in Context: Laws X 884a-887c. Aither, Journal for the study of Greek and Latin philosophical traditions, 11(22), 50-73. https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2019.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2019.006

Jefatura del Estado. (1995). Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal. Boletín Oficial del Estado, (281).

La Rue, F., Haraszti, M., Botero Marino, C. y Pansy Tlakula, F. (2008). Declaración Conjunta sobre Difamación de Religiones y sobre Legislación Anti-Terrorista y Anti-Extremista. Relatoría Especial para la Libertad de Expresión. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.consejodecomunicacion.gob.ec//handle/CONSEJO_REP/440

Laks, A. (2022). Plato's Second Republic. An Essay on Laws. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691236063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv269fw2b

Mayhew, R. (2008). Plato. Laws 10, Translation and Commentary. Oxford University Press.

Mayhew, R. (2010). The theology of the Laws. En C. Bobonich (Ed.), Plato's 'Laws': A Critical Guide (pp. 197-216). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781483.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781483.011

McPherran, M. L. (2002). Justice and Pollution in the Euthyphro. Apeiron, 35(2), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2002.35.2.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2002.35.2.105

Miller, A. (1995). Objectivity Disfigured: Mark Johnton's Missing-Explanation Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(4), 857-868. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2108336

Morris, T.F. (1990). Plato’s Euthyphro. Heythrop Journal, 31(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.1990.tb00140.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.1990.tb00140.x

O'Meara, D. J. (2017). Cosmology and Politics in Plato’s Later Works. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316869581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316869581

Pangle, T. L. (1976). The Political Psychology of Religion in Plato's Laws. The American Political Science Review, 70(4), 1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1959374

Pigliucci, M. (2009). Blasphemy Laws in the 2nd Century [Blog]. Rationally Speaking, Blogspot. Recuperado de: https://atheist.ie/2009/06/blasphemy-laws-in-the-21st-century/

Platón (1988). República. Diálogos IV. Gredos.

Platón (1997). Eutifrón (A. Gómez-Lobo, Trad.). Editorial Universitaria.

Platón (2014) Las Leyes (J. M. Pabón y L. Fernández Galiano, Trads.). Alianza.

Quinn, P. L. (1981). Religious Obedience and Moral Autonomy. En P. Helm (Ed.), Divine Commands and Morality (pp. 49-66). Oxford University Press.

Rachels, J. (1971). God and Human Attitudes. Religious Studies, 7(4), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500000391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500000391

Reid, J. (2021). The Mixed Constitution in Plato’s Laws. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 99(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1707244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1707244

Reid, J. (En prensa). Plato on Democracy. En E. Robinson y V. Arena (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Democracy, Vol. 1: From Democratic Beginnings to c. 1350. Cambridge University Press.

Romerales, E. (1994). ¿El único fundamento posible de la ética? Isegoría, (10), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.1994.i10.276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.1994.i10.276

Romerales, E. (1995). Sobre la fundamentación lógica de la moral en la religión. Contextos, XIII(25-26), 223-250.

Rorty, R. (2006). Anticlericalismo y ateísmo. En S. Zabala (Comp.), El futuro de la religión (pp. 47-63). Paidós.

Rosen, F. (1968). Piety and Justice: Plato's ‘Euthyphro’. Philosophy, 43(164), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100008998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100008998

Saunders, T. J. (1994). Plato's Penal Code: Tradition, Controversy, and Reform in Greek Penology. Clarendon Press.

Taylor, C.C.W. (1982). The End of the Euthyphro. Phronesis, 27(1-2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882X00087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882X00087

Tugendhat, E. (2008). Antropología en vez de metafísica. Gedisa.

Whitmarsh, T. (2016). Battling the gods: Atheism in the ancient world. Alfred A. Knopf.

Zunjic, S. (2010). Plato. Euthyphro. An outline. The University of Rhode Island. Recuperado de: http://www.uri.edu/personal/szunjic/philos/euth.htm

Velázquez Jordana, J. L. (2025). The immorality of atheism. Praxis Filosófica, (62), e20915441. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i62.15441

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.